How a Rare Legal Rule in Texas Can Overturn Judges’ Orders
Image source: Pexels.com
Have you ever heard of the supersedeas rule? It’s a unique provision in Texas law that allows the attorney general to supersede a state judge’s order by simply filing an appeal. This means that the judge’s decision is immediately blocked and the status quo is restored until the appeal is resolved.
This rule has been used several times this year by the Office of the Attorney General to ensure that new Texas laws take effect, despite legal challenges from various groups. Some of these laws include the strict abortion ban, the election security bill, and the transgender health care ban.
But what is the rationale behind this rule? And what are the implications for Texans who are affected by these laws?
The Origin and Purpose of the Supersedeas Rule
The supersedeas rule dates back to 1876, when it was added to the Texas Constitution as part of the Reconstruction era reforms. The rule was intended to prevent judges from issuing injunctions that would interfere with the enforcement of state laws or the collection of taxes.
The rule states that “no injunction or writ of error or stay of proceedings shall be issued or granted by any judge or court to stay or arrest the operation or execution of any law made by the Legislature of this State, except by the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals, until final hearing and determination of any suit, action, or proceeding pending in such court involving the validity of such law.”
In other words, if a judge issues an order that blocks a state law from taking effect, the attorney general can file an appeal and supersede that order, effectively nullifying it until the higher courts decide on the case.
The rule was rarely used until recently, when it became a powerful tool for the attorney general to defend controversial laws passed by the Republican-dominated legislature.
The Controversy and Criticism of the Supersedeas Rule
The use of the supersedeas rule has sparked a lot of debate and criticism among lawyers, activists, and citizens. Some of the arguments against the rule are:
- It violates the separation of powers between the executive and judicial branches of government. The rule gives too much power to the attorney general, who can override a judge’s order without any review or oversight.
- It deprives Texans of their constitutional rights and due process. The rule prevents people from challenging laws that may infringe on their rights, such as access to health care, voting, or privacy. It also denies them the opportunity to have their cases heard and decided by an impartial judge.
- It creates uncertainty and confusion for Texans who are subject to these laws. The rule makes it unclear whether a law is in effect or not, depending on whether an appeal has been filed or not. This can have serious consequences for people who may face criminal charges, civil penalties, or other harms for violating these laws.
Some lawyers have challenged the constitutionality of the supersedeas rule in court, arguing that it violates the due process clause of the 14th Amendment. However, so far, no court has ruled on this issue.
The Future and Impact of the Supersedeas Rule
The supersedeas rule is likely to remain in place for the foreseeable future, unless it is repealed by the legislature or struck down by the courts. This means that Texans can expect more legal battles over new laws that may affect their lives and rights.
The impact of these laws will depend on how long it takes for the appeals to be resolved. Some cases may take months or years to reach a final decision, while others may be expedited or dismissed quickly. In any case, Texans should be aware of their legal options and seek professional advice if they are affected by these laws.
I hope you enjoyed reading this blog post. Thank you for your time and attention.
0