Image source: Pexels.com

Gun violence is a serious problem in the United States. Every day, 13 children under the age of 19 are killed by gunfire and more are injured. Homicide is the second leading cause of death for youths 10–19 years old. Most youth homicides are committed with firearms, especially handguns.

How can we reduce gun violence and save lives? This is a question that many people are asking, especially after the recent mass shootings in schools, workplaces, and public places. Some people believe that the government should restrict the availability of guns to reduce violence. Others argue that the right to bear arms is guaranteed by the Constitution and that more guns mean less crime.

The Case for Gun Control

The proponents of gun control argue that more guns lead to more violent crime. They cite statistics that support their position, such as:

• The US has the highest rate of gun ownership in the world, with about 120 guns per 100 people. It also has the highest rate of gun deaths among developed countries, with about 12 deaths per 100,000 people.
• States with stricter gun laws have lower rates of gun deaths than states with looser gun laws. For example, California has a lower rate of gun deaths than Texas, even though both states have similar populations and demographics.
• Countries with stricter gun laws have lower rates of gun deaths than countries with looser gun laws. For example, Japan has a very low rate of gun deaths, less than one per million people, because it has very strict gun laws that prohibit almost all civilians from owning firearms.

Benefits of Gun Control Policies

The advocates of gun control also point out the benefits of implementing certain policies to reduce gun violence, such as:

• Background checks: These are checks that verify the identity and criminal history of a person who wants to buy a gun. They can prevent people who are prohibited from owning guns, such as felons, domestic abusers, or mentally ill people, from getting access to firearms.
• Red flag laws: These are laws that allow family members or law enforcement to petition a court to temporarily remove guns from a person who poses a danger to themselves or others. They can prevent people who are in crisis or have violent tendencies from harming themselves or others with guns.
• Assault weapons ban: This is a ban on certain types of firearms that have features that make them more lethal, such as high-capacity magazines or rapid-fire mechanisms. They can reduce the number of casualties in mass shootings.

The Case Against Gun Control

The opponents of gun control argue that guns don’t cause violence, people do. They cite statistics that challenge the claims of the other side, such as:

• There is no clear correlation between gun ownership and gun violence across countries or states. For example, Switzerland has a high rate of gun ownership, about 46 guns per 100 people, but a low rate of gun deaths, about 3 per 100,000 people.
• There is no evidence that stricter gun laws reduce crime or violence. For example, Chicago has some of the strictest gun laws in the country, but also one of the highest rates of homicide and shootings.
• There is evidence that more guns deter crime or violence. For example, studies have shown that concealed carry laws, which allow law-abiding citizens to carry guns for self-defense, reduce violent crime rates by deterring criminals who fear armed victims.

Rights and Freedoms of Gun Owners

The opponents of gun control also defend their right to bear arms as a constitutional and human right. They argue that:

• The Second Amendment of the Constitution states that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed”. This means that the government cannot take away or limit the right of citizens to own guns for self-defense or other lawful purposes.
• The right to self-defense is a natural and universal right that every person has. This means that every person has the right to use force, including lethal force if necessary, to protect themselves or others from harm.
• The right to resist tyranny is a historical and political right that every citizen has. This means that citizens have the right to use arms to overthrow a tyrannical or oppressive government if it violates their rights or freedoms.

My Opinion

After reviewing both sides of the argument, I have to say that I lean more towards the gun control side. I think that some of the arguments against gun control are invalid or exaggerated, such as:

• The Second Amendment is not absolute or unlimited. It was written in a different historical and social context, when the US was a young nation facing threats from foreign enemies and rebellious states. It also mentions a “well-regulated Militia”, which implies some form of regulation or restriction on gun ownership.
• The right to self-defense is not absolute or unlimited either. It does not justify using excessive or disproportionate force, or harming innocent bystanders. It also does not mean that everyone needs a gun to defend themselves. There are other ways to protect oneself, such as using non-lethal weapons, calling the police, or avoiding dangerous situations.
• The right to resist tyranny is not realistic or relevant in today’s world. The US is a stable and democratic country, with a system of checks and balances, elections, and courts. The chances of a tyrannical or oppressive government taking over are very slim. And even if that happened, a bunch of armed civilians would not stand a chance against a modern military.

I think that some of the arguments for gun control are valid and reasonable, such as:

• Background checks are a common-sense measure that can prevent guns from falling into the wrong hands. They are supported by the majority of Americans, including gun owners. They do not infringe on the rights of law-abiding citizens who want to buy guns legally.
• Red flag laws are a preventive measure that can save lives. They are based on evidence and due process, not on arbitrary or subjective criteria. They can help people who are in danger of harming themselves or others get the help they need.
• Assault weapons ban is a sensible measure that can reduce the damage caused by mass shootings. These weapons are designed for war, not for civilian use. They have no legitimate purpose other than killing as many people as possible in a short time.

crime rates gun control gun laws gun rights gun violence

Ghazala Siddique